Creationist Museum Lies About Archaeopteryx

I was going to write a lengthy critique of the blatantly dishonest portrayal of Archaeoptery at the Creation Museum. But, I got tired of it, and it ended up just sitting there and stagnating for month after month. So, I decided to post a short “Cliff’s Notes” version of the original even though the whole Creation Museum thing is old news.

The Creation Museum had a model of a life restoration of Archaeopteryx present in their Garden of Eden exhibit where they deliberately reconstructed its anatomy inaccurately to make it look much more like a modern bird than it actually would have. The following is a list of just a few of the ommissions and alterations of Archaeopteryx‘s anatomy present in their model:

  • Its reptillian jaws were replaced with a beak.
  • Its teeth were removed.
  • The place where the neck joins the skull was changed, removing Archaeopteryx‘s nice, S-shaped theropod-like neck.
  • It was given a keeled breast, making its flight muscles look much bigger (and less primitive).
  • Its legs were shortened to make them look less like a predatory dinosaur’s.
  • Archaeopteryx‘s hyper extensible toe (think Velociraptor‘s big claw) was removed.
  • Archaeopteryx‘s long dinosaurian tail was shorted drastically.
  • Lastly, and most absurdly: Archaeopteryx was given the same plumage coloration as a modern pidgeon!
  • The items on this list, of course, make the claim touted by many creationists that Archaeopteryx was “fully a bird” (instead of a transitional form) seem much more believeable to someone not familiar with the animal’s anatomy.But as someone who is somewhat familiar with Archaeopteryx, I have to just say “Wow.” This level of dishonesty is a new low even for creationists.

    Maybe AiG or the sculptor of the model could claim the anatomical inaccuracies were a mistake. That would be convenient, though, as lots of creationist “mistakes” seem to “accidentally” lend support to creationism. More on the Creation Museum’s treatment of Archaeopteryx can be found here.

    9 Responses to Creationist Museum Lies About Archaeopteryx

    1. WhoreChurch says:

      When I first began studying evolution I was most angry about Christians who claimed to know better lying to me.

      When I go to a museum I have an expectation of the curators: That they present things truthfully. Yes I understand all branches of science are evolving (pardon the pun), but to put up exhibits or write “scientific” papers which misrepresent the facts is simply lying. And these folks lie in the name of Jesus.

      Ken Ham, Kent Hovind, et. al. claim credentials and expertise. Because they also claim to be Christians they get the benefit of the doubt from an uninformed public. They are no more than charlatan snake-oil salesmen who will soon damage the cause of Christ as they are again and again shown to be lying.

    2. Amen, WC! :D That’s why I’m so resentful of them.

    3. [...] reconstruction. Abyssal’s Web Log makes a number of interesting claims in a posting titled Creationist Museum Lies About Archaeopteryx. First, we’ll point out that there is no evidence that Abyssal was ever at the museum, and [...]

    4. WhoreChurch says:

      Of course those educated individuals who HAVE been to the museum agree with Aby. Straw man anyone?

    5. He’s right about me being wrong about the teeth, though. Time to make some corrections.

    6. Ricki says:

      After battling with the likes of Hovind and Ham for some time, there is no doubt in my mind that these guys are deliberately lying. Nobody could be as pig-headed, ignorant or just plain stupid as these guys are. The sirens of fame, adoration and profit have clearly got these guys and they’ll stop at nothing to keep their lies going. Check out http://www.answersingenesis.com and you’ll get the picture.

    7. webdesign says:

      adore it site layout . How was it made. It is rather nice!

    8. I use a few which you mentioned. Individually, I like SEO Quake Toolbar and I adore SEM Rush. I think SEM Hurry is the ideal look marketing explore device. Surely worth the price tag purchased.

    9. Does anyone know if there is a skeletal reconstruction in a museum, somewhere? Or were the bones from the various Archaeopteryx fossils too fragile to extract from the rocks in which they were found?

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.